Adam Luke

Archive for the ‘Media’ Category

On Meeting eFriends, and Alice in Wonderland (2010)

An eFriend in Melbourne

What is it about people I meet from the Internet, generally being cooler than people I meet offline? Yes, there are a lot of ‘tards online, but the people who can string a sentence together are generally pretty fun. Lucy,1 who was the first person I met on the Internet (on LiveJournal) before meeting In Real Life, was back in Melbourne this week, for the Australian Intervarsity Debating Championships, which, coincidentally, was being held at my university. We caught up, and fun times were had. It’s sort of odd interacting with someone who knows so much about me. But that’s what happens when they’ve been reading your journal for something like four years? I can’t really remember how long, but anyway, we both agreed that each of us know significantly more about each other than our Real Life friends.

Alice in Wonderland (2010)

So, next topic! I’ve had some of this in the draft stage for almost two weeks now, so I figure I should post it. Now, If I only I would get around to finishing my various other draft posts…

Anyway, at what point, in 3D movies, does having stuff chucked at the screen/towards the audience become cliché? Really, 3D is the gimmick it doesn’t need to be. Instead of producing something great with it, the filmmakers always end up having something thrown towards the audience, which admittedly makes me almost flinch, but is getting old.

Alice in Wonderland was a decent film, but I think I’d have preferred a complete reimagining, rather than a sequel. Admittedly, I liked having an older Alice, and I also enjoyed the darkness (I get annoyed when everything is too bright and cheery!), but it just seemed a little bit…lame, with her returning to Wonderland. And the fight scene at the end left a bit to be desired. Fantasy battle scenes in movies children will be watching can be done well, just look at The Chronicles of Narnia!

I also found it lulzy that Johnny Depp was the first person to be credited at the end (before the title of the movie, which everyone else was after!), and Mia Wasikowska (who is sort of a no-name, but played Alice) was the last person to be credited.


  1. I’ve photospammed some of our previous adventures on this blog in the following posts: Graffiti and Shrine

Single Songs Versus Albums

You know those weeks where nothing seems to go right? I just had one.

But in other news, today’s idea for blog entry came from a conversation among me, Flamboyant Gaga Fanboy (who went to both Lady Gaga’s Melbourne shows), and Top 40 Girl:

Top 40 Girl: What was the highlight of the show?

Flamboyant Gaga Fanboy: Definitely “So Happy I Could Die”.

Me: Really? [as I learnt when I saw The Decemberists, show highlights can come from unexpected songs, but I was still incredulous, because it's a pretty crappy song. But then again, most Lady Gaga songs are!]

Top 40 Girl: I don’t know that song.

Me: How do I know it and you don’t?

Flamboyant Gaga Fanboy: How do you know it?

My point is that people don’t listen to entire albums anymore, and it’s sad. What with the rise of the iTunes Store and peer-to-peer software, people mainly just listen to lead singles, which are really not always the best songs of the album. Albums should be listened to in full!

But anyway, I have sort of a reputation for listening to obscure music. In fact, Lady Gaga is the only thing I know about Top 40-type music. It’s hard not to know her music. Here’s an example conversation:

Friend: You know that “Sexy Bitch” song?

Me: No.

Friend: Oh…

I often listen to gapless albums, and concept albums; songs from which are not exactly meant to be listened to out of context. I do it anyway, but perhaps it’s another reason I find it disappointing that people aren’t listening to entire albums…

Focus Questions: What about you? Do you listen to entire albums, or just a few songs?

Avatar (2009)

At last, I’ve seen Avatar! There were two reasons I put it off so long:

  1. The 3D factor: I’ve mentioned before that I dislike wearing 3D glasses. They’re uncomfortable!
  2. The length: Clocking in at 160 minutes, it’s not a film for the restless! I can get very restless and bored during long movies if they aren’t entertaining enough. Some movies are just too long, and should really have a cap placed on their length.

Avatar film posterHowever! Neither of these perceived problems were really problems at all. I know that some cinemas offer 2D versions of Avatar, but I’ve heard so much about the très awesome 3D, that I, yet again, decided to give the glasses a try. My verdict is that the RealD glasses I used for Avatar at Village Cinemas, are less bad than the XpanD 3D glasses I used for Coraline at Hoyts, in terms of level of comfort and perceived brightness of the screen.

Yes, they did hurt my eyes a bit and did get uncomfortable, but holy wow were they worth it. Use of 3D in Avatar was best ever. And all this stuff I’ve said about 3D film not being any better than 2D? I take it all back. The visuals were pretty remarkable, and I don’t think it would’ve had nearly the same effect on DVD, which is why I suspect I’d give it a lower rating if I were to view it on DVD instead.

It’s true that the storyline isn’t the most original, but I feel that it was still decent, and I didn’t get restless or bored at all, which is a pretty excellent accomplishment on James Cameron’s part. Someone on IMDB summed it up nicely when they wrote “Technically outstanding. Originality: oh well…”.

One thing I noticed, however, is that Sam Worthington needs to improve his American accent. Unless his character was supposed to have hints of Australia in his voice? I suspect not.