Adam Luke

Just taking a video

I came across this video (there’s also a part one and part two). A pretty courageous guy, Surveillance Camera Man, is “just taking a video” of random people in public. It seems creepy and harass-y, but it’s also somehow entertaining. Watching the array of reactions is just compelling.

It raises an interesting point, though. At any time of the day, we could have multiple cameras watching us, so why get so offended about one more? Well, maybe because it’s going to end up on YouTube, but they don’t know that. I usually shy away from video cameras and I definitely wouldn’t want a stranger filming me on the street. But still, I’m obviously filmed in public by CCTV cameras all the time, and I don’t give it a second (or first!) thought. Maybe we don’t mind being filmed in that way because we don’t expect anybody to be watching or paying attention to the footage. Or maybe we think it’s fine because it’s under the guise of “security”. I don’t know how much public security cameras actually enhance security, though. But that’s probably a different topic.


I was reminded of so many cringeworthy things while typing this post

well, my day was going ok, but then i remembered something stupid i said when i was 14

This comic showed up in my feed reader recently. It’s brief, but it holds so much meaning for me! And I know a lot of people can relate. Sometimes it’s just unfortunately hard to forget about all the dumb shit you’ve said and done in your life. And when, for some reason, it gets dragged into your short-term memory, you hate yourself and everything else for that brief moment, grimacing and cursing under your breath (semi-involuntarily!). You know it’s irrational hang onto crappy moments from the past so much, because probably no-one else remembers them so vividly as you, and they’re even less likely to care.

But I can’t help ruminating ok. Nedroid depicts this situation amusingly  too.


Then again, I just don’t understand the concept of being offended by words

You know AMC, right? They air Breaking Bad and The Walking Dead.

Well anyway, here’s a screencap from the most recent episode of Breaking Bad:

piece of paper that has a pixellated version of the words fuck you

I think I smirked when I saw it. I was thinking, that’s right, the same show that depicts cooking meth, taking heroin, killing children, and melting dead bodies in acid, has to pixelate Bad Words. From what I can tell, the show being on cable and all, this swearing ban is imposed by AMC itself rather than the FCC or whoever. It’s just interesting that swearing is considered worse than everything on the list I just presented to you! Especially considering that the violence and drug themes are more graphic than what you’d see on network television.

Of course, I’d rather have some parts censored than write characters to talk the way they wouldn’t in Real Life. I guess it’s more credible. Fuck-bombs are occasionally in the Breaking Bad script, but muted in the airing. But it’s just like, I’m pretty sure people who are okay with the content of Breaking Bad are also okay with a bit of casual swearing now and again. AMC, are you really going to lose advertisers if you don’t censor? I wonder…

Showing someone’s throat get cut with a box cutter? “YEAH MAN GOGOGOGO”. Swearing? “NO WAY ARE YOU KIDDING ME???” Classic.


Actually, I didn’t realise there were any perks to being a wallflower

I read The Perks of Being a Wallflower by Stephen Chbosky recently. I’d been wanting to read it for quite a few years, but these days it’s rare for me to read a novel. My reading time is devoted to non-fiction and study! But I still knew I had to read Perks, and preferably soon. Perks is a coming-of-age novel about a Charlie, a fifteen year-old who starts to “participate” in life after befriending two seniors at his new high school. He is exposed to many new experiences, as well as books and music1. Like many people, I felt that I could relate to Charlie. The blurb will explain why:

Charlie is a freshman. And while he’s not the biggest geek in school, he is by no means popular. Shy, introspective, intelligent beyond his years yet socially awkward, he is a wallflower, caught between trying to live his life and trying to run from it. Charlie is attempting unchartered territory…Charlie can’t stay on the sideline forever. Standing on the fringes of life offers a unique perspective. But there comes a time to see what it looks like from the dance floor.

book coverI thought that I’d be reading a book about myself! Charlie sounds like high-school-me, after all. I thought I’d gain some sort of insight about who I am, somehow. I want to learn more about myself as much as the next guy. But although the novel covered many common teenage issues, upon reading it I don’t think Charlie’s experiences could be considered commonplace, even among “wallflowers”. It turned out that Charlie and I are not the same person, although I did enjoyed his perspective, and could still relate to some of his introspection.

It’s hard not to like Charlie — he’s a sweet guy, if naïve, and perhaps juvenile at times. Some reviewers online were convinced for a while that Charlie was autistic. He isn’t, but he does have emotional and social problems, this much is true. If I do too, they’re certainly not the same or externalised in the same way.

It also turns out that Perks is very quotable. I don’t want to repeat the lines here because I feel like some of them must be cliché online by now! From what I’ve heard anyway, they show up on tumblr pasted over random images. Still, it’s not often that I stop and realise I just read a great line and decide I need to keep it in my memory bank.

The best part of the experience was that I…I think it made me feel Feelings? Well, maybe. The reveal in the last couple of letters2 was almost, as it put on the back of the book, “deeply affecting”. The ending is sombre, yet optimistic? At the start of the book, Charlie feels “both happy and sad”, and I ended it feeling almost the same way.

The Perks of Being a Wallflower really resonated with me, for some reason. Some books (and movies), you think are great, but forget them almost straight away. Sometimes you don’t realise how good they are until you keep thinking about them.

The movie

There’s a film adaptation coming out soon! Actually, there isn’t a release date for Australia (yet?), which is like, excuse me, film distributor or whatever, I want to see this. I wasn’t sure how well a film adaptation would work, considering the format of the book. A novel written as a series of letters, wherein Charlie very often discusses his feelings and background information about why characters are they way they are, might not translate to the big screen. However! The film was both written and directed by Chbosky himself, and I feel good about this.The trailer indicates there might be at least some narration? Well, here’s the trailer:

And it looks at least vaguely promising. But it seems a bit “generic high school movie”. And considering the mature themes in the novel, the classification seems lower than you might expect.


  1. And I’m pretty sure that if you look up on YouTube any of the songs mentioned in the novel, there will be a bunch of elitists upset that people discovered the song through a book. It’s always the case. Damn hipsters.
  2. Perks is an “epistolary novel”, which in this case means that it is written as a series of letters to an anonymous character. Almost like very-honest diary entries, since you don’t hear from the stranger.